RE: Letter to the editor Essay

In answer to your missive. I would wish to inform you. that the policy sing the remotion of Aboriginal kids was non as you stated. Equally shortly as a kid was born. they were considered a ward of the province because of their Aboriginality.

The policy of Assimilation was established in 1911 for the remotion of kids from their community to snuff out their civilization. This is besides known as Genocide. but was non seen that manner until the policy was removed in the mid 1960s.

Bessy Flower was born in 1943. and taken from her place at 19 months. She was a merchandise of the Assimilation policy. Bessy was removed merely the same as most of the other kids. pulled obscenely from her female parents weaponries. She was placed to populate in the Annesfield native establishment for the following 14 old ages of her life.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Merely the same as most of the other Aboriginal kids in the places. she was no longer allowed to do any contact with her household and was subjected to ongoing physical. mental and sexual maltreatment. malnutrition and humiliation. In some of the establishments the criterions of life were degrading merely so that the kids could hold an instruction and go ‘absorbed’ into the white community. some say it was as if they had been tried to be turned a ‘different shadiness of white’ .

The half-caste kids were taken under a statute law. which gave care to the defenders in their province of beginning. The people that looked after the kids once they were removed. one time called ‘protectors’ . took up the function of paternalism. This gave the parents no right to appeal to the tribunal of jurisprudence. and the kids had no pick in what they did or where they went.

After 1940 the kids were removed under the general kid public assistance statute law. but still the manner the kids were extracted was much the same as before.

Merely really bit by bit did the rite of dividing half-caste kids from their places run into with the general non-Aboriginal patterns refering kid maltreatment and disregard. This came every bit tardily as the seventiess. when already 10s of 1000s of kids had been removed.

The ground the kids were removed was ever thought to be for their ain benefit. to protect them from themselves. every bit good as to ‘breed-out’ the Aboriginal race as it was thought that they were less-superior to white people.

Some people remember ; “”We were told that our female parent was an alcoholic and that she was a cocotte and she didn’t attention about us. They used to warn us that when we got older we’d have to watch it because we’d bend into slatterns and alkies. so we had to be really careful. If you were white you didn’t have that uncleanness in you … It was in our strain. in us to be like that. ””

Although now. there is thought to be non one Aboriginal household that has non been scared by the remotion of a kid. sibling. niece or nephew. Somewhere between one in three and one in 10 kids were removed. One in 10 is a large figure of people to be subjected to the maltreatment endured. but one in three is absurd. Some of these kids were taken at birth. some at two old ages of age. some in their childhood old ages.

When the kids were removed. they were given a opportunity at an instruction that they would ne’er hold gotten otherwise. Not all of the kids had a atrocious up-bringing ; some were placed into places and treated with regard from their surrogate households. “”We were all happy together. us childs. We had two really fantastic old ladies that looked after us. It [ Colebrook. South Australia ] wasn’t like an establishment truly. It was merely a large happy household. Y’know they gave us good instruction. they encouraged us to be no different to anybody else. ””

These kids have called themselves the ‘Stolen Generation’ . Although all the State authoritiess in Australia have apologized for the unfairness that went on. the Federal Governments still refuse the Natives right to an apology or compensation.


hypertext transfer protocol: //72. 14. 203. 104/search? q=cache: NldOa-78ca0J: World Wide Web. ondix. com/pdf/docs/studies_research_college_1071167943. pdf+bessy+flower+1943+assimilation & A ; hl=en & A ; gl=au & A ; ct=clnk & A ; cd=2 Told a narrative that helped with the penetration to the inhuman treatment of what truly went on in some people’s lives as an affect of assimilation.

hypertext transfer protocol: //www. tim-richardson. net/misc/stolen_generation. hypertext markup language Explains clearly the Assimilation policy. and the statute laws environing it.

hypertext transfer protocol: //www. hreoc. gov. au/bth/additional_resources/bth_guide/children_experiences. htm Gave some quotation marks form people that were removed who grew up with good lives. and bad.

Documentary watched with Mrs. Hooks category can’t retrieve what it was called. but it had people explicating merely how much they suffered. even when they had a good life to happen out what truly happened and where their household might hold been for the past 70 old ages. More enlightening than cyberspace sites because they were proper interviews.