“Killing for Sport” by Joseph Wood Krutch is an opinionated work on the subject of hunting for sport. He uses rational appeals to press the point of the sportsman as having less to gain out of the killing than the liar, the thief, or the murderer. Josephs primary aim is to persuade the reader to his view on killing for sport. He uses the evaluation mode to reason out the logic behind his argument. The writer persuades the reader to the side of the anti-sport hunter by stating, “killing for killings sake is a terrifying phenomenon.
Krutch uses rational comparisons to assert his point, “Most wicked deeds are done because the doer proposes some good for himself”. There is emotional persuasion used when the writer sights the hunter as “gratuitously evil. ” The writer also characterizes the hunters by saying they “merely prefer death to life, darkness to light. ” The writer claims that killing for sport should not be continued. The dominant mode of the paper is evaluation.
Many of his stronger arguments use comparison and contrast to show the difference between the good and the bad. ” He seems to get nothing other than the satisfaction of saying: Something which wanted to live is dead. ” On the other hand the killer for food receives life in return for his killing, further stating that the hunter for sport is evil. This work clearly exposes gaming hunters and expresses how senseless it is to kill for fun. Krutch identifies hunting as a “reality of evil” because we know it is wrong to kill without purpose.
There is a secondary descriptive mode used to illuminate the readers imagination and give them insight into the working of the hunter character. I believe Krutch used the evaluation mode to create a distinctive, persuasive, description of the hunter. Joseph Krutch has done a very effective job on this persuasive topic. Through the persuasive aim and the evaluation mode, he has demonstrated the rationale behind killing for sport. “Killing for killings sake isas strong a proof as we could have of that “reality of evil” with which present day theologians are again concerned. ”