As sees the Validity of this Statement. When Elizabeth succeeded her sister Mary I in 1 558 the official doctrine of the Church of England was still Catholicism and so Elizabeth enacted a series of reforms and doctrinal changes to bring about a largely Protestant religious settlement that retained some elements of Catholicism which the Queen was partial to.
For the Elizabethan religious s talent to be considered successful it would have had to been widely accepted and support deed by both the itty and the clergy, faced little opposition from conservative Catholics and RA decal Protestants and undergone very little change throughout the period due to Elizabethan De sire that the settlement be final. Indeed Doran has argued that the Elizabethan religious SE talent was accepted by the government the clergy and the laity and as a result Protestant t worship and devotion developed.
On the other hand High has argued that the Church Of England was populated with a clergy who were at very least conservative if not Catholic. The is essay will argue that in the period 15581564 the religious settlement was broadly success useful as it was slowly adhered to with little opposition up until 1564. In 1564 there were shall engines to it from radical protestants and in 1 568 conservative Catholics also reacted against it.
However despite such challenges, which were from a highly committed minority, the SE talent remained largely unchanged and as such was broadly SUccessfUl. In the period 1 5591564 the religious settlement was broadly successful. The n tauter of the settlement was moderate as it retained some elements of Catholicism’s rituals and ceremonies; such as the allowing the wearing of ‘foppish’ vestments after the r Loyal injunctions f 1559 and, after 1560, allowing requiem masses (a catholic mass for repose of the souls of the dead) to occur.
The retirement of these rituals encouraged widespread us port among the populace many of whom still enjoyed some of the more grandiose, Catholic ICC elements of worship, furthermore the visitations by the crown in the summer and autumn of 1 559 saw the majority of Marina additions to the church removed and the churches revert d to the plainness of the Edwardian years. However it can also be argued that uniform itty did not occur quickly, undermining the success of the settlement.
The north of England pro Veda stubbornly assistant to reforms brought about by the settlement as strong Catholic sump atheist continued to exist there, the conversion of churches took substantially longer than in the south as it proved more difficult to remove additions made under Mary in areas such as Lancashire and York demonstrating that uniformity was not immediately established under t he settlement. Therefore the evidence suggests that overall the settlement was broadly such useful in establishing a uniform Church of England and that it lacked substantial oppose action in doing so between 15581 564. N 1 559 the crown also tried to ensure the clergy was supportive to ensure the success of the settlement, they sent out visitors to ensure the act Of supremacy was accepted d and although some refused to do so the vast majority of the 80009000 parishes in England conformed, adding weight to Williams’ argument that the vast majority of the lower clergy were willing to conform even if their attachment to the new doctrine was superficial.
Further more the upper clergy was largely unproblematic due to the resignation of all but one of the Marina Bishops had resigned by 1 559 allowing Elizabeth to replace them with ones who would d be enthusiastic about her reforms.
However there is evidence to demonstrate that the clergy id not always conform to the settlement, some local ministers simply ignored the new book of common prayers and stuck to traditional catholic worship, a survey in 1564 revealed on lay half of ministers could be relied on to actively support the settlement thus undermine inning its effectiveness. In addition 400 clergy were deprived of their seats or resigned, 50% of these were a result of refusals to comply with the act of supremacy.
Therefore it is c Lear that despite some localized opposition to the settlement from the clergy the vast majority of the clergy of the Church of England were willing to conform to Elizabethan settlement even I they didn’t fully support it in the period thus demonstrating the settlements success bet when 15581564 Between 1 5591564 the laity conformed to the settlement thus suggesting it w as widely successful, very few fled abroad when compared to the 800 protestants who fled when Mao,’ came to the throne and the scale of refusal to conform to the settlement Elise Beth laid out in 1558 was minimal.
Despite this evidence of localized opposition does exist, 9 % of the Northern Parishes refused to accept royal supremacy, effectively disobeying t he queen and undermining the settlement, in addition one third of the gentry were estimate to be recusant which further undermined the settlement.